Many pronatalists consider the suffering in the world as amounts of ill-being that can be compensated for by certain amounts of well-being.
While it will be difficult to defend this view it looks like any well-being can easily be diminshed or even nullified.
There’ll be no suffering if you stop procreating.
I readily admit there’s a lot of suffering out there. But then the suffering, pain and fear that people do experience is compensated for by the good things in life they do also experience.
Well, obviously it’s people like you – the defenders of procreation – who find themselves forced to resort to the logics of compensation. It’s you who have to defend your position since you want to change the ethical state of the world by adding more sentient beings. The supreme position is the antinatalists’ position as they don’t want to add sentient beings to the world whose ill-being or well-being we’d have to discuss. This suggests a certain weakness of the pronatalists’ stance.